Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

New USFWS Critical Habitat Rule for Bull Trout Adds Complications

Responding to a court order, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service earlier this week announced it is designating approximately 1,748 miles of streams and 61,235 acres of lakes in the Columbia and Klamath River basins of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho as critical habitat for the bull trout under the Endangered Species Act. While many western producers cheered the news that the final rule is much less broad than those originally proposed, the new rule imposes another potential layer of regulation on Klamath Project operations.

Congressman Chris Cannon (UT), Chairman of the Western Caucus said, "This designation demonstrates that science-based cooperative efforts are effective. Habitat and species can be recovered through cooperative measures. It is comforting to see that science has prevailed in this case. I applaud the Fish and Wildlife Service for a job well done."

Dan Keppen, Executive Director of the Klamath Water Users Association, acknowledged that the final rule should be far-less ranging than the original proposal, but that local water managers are concerned about potential additional regulations that might effect Upper Klamath Lake water users.

"Despite formal concerns that we transmitted to USFWS in May 2003 on its proposed rule, the final rule includes Agency Lake within the critical habitat designation," Keppen said. "Now we have four individual fish species listed under the Endangered Species Act to deal with, when the perceived water needs of three are already in competition with one another."

New USFWS Habitat Rule for Bull Trout Adds Complications (Continued)

The critical habitat rule includes a "migratory corridor" for bull trout that includes Agency Lake, which could impact the ability of the federal government to use this area for storage, and could also complicate efforts to expand storage into adjacent lands, like the Barnes property. The justification for the migratory corridor was to provide a safe route to allow bull trout to move between streams that enter Agency Lake. The map developed in the final bull trout rule, however, does not include the streams for which the original migratory corridor was proposed to connect.

Environmental groups ripped the decision, since the final rule includes much less critical habitat across the Pacific Northwest than the original proposal. Wednesday's announcement dropped all Montana waters off the list and reduced the regionwide total by 90 percent. Supporters for the designation promised to sue over the recent rule decision.

"If a judge doesn't overturn this decision, bull trout will go extinct," said Michael Garrity, executive director of Alliance for the Wild Rockies, told The Missoulian. "Now habitat can be degraded in Montana. Now it will be gone. Bull trout have lost all of that protection."

Critical habitat refers to specific geographic areas that are essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and which may require special management considerations. A designation does not set up a preserve or refuge, but it can apply to situations where Federal funding, permits, or projects are involved. It does not affect citizens engaged in activities on private land that do not involve a federal agency.

Continued on page 2


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

Activists Won Court Decision that Pushed Feds to Complete Bull Trout Rule

Wednesday’s designation by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is the first of two legally mandated critical habitat designations that will be made for bull trout. In January 2002, the Service and the Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Friends of the Wild Swan reached a court settlement establishing a schedule for the proposal of critical habitat for bull trout. The two environmental groups had sued USFWS for not designating critical habitat when it listed bull trout in 1998 as threatened throughout its range in the lower 48 states.

In Oregon, USFWS designated 706 miles of streams and 33,939 acres of lakes and marshes as critical habitat for bull trout. All of the lakes and marshes are in the Klamath River basin, and include Agency Lake and Sycan Marsh.

After proposing critical habitat in November 2002 for bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath river basins, USFWS held nine public hearings and numerous public meetings, reviewed 549 written comments from the public and obtained peer review of its proposal from the American Fisheries Society. The public had a total of seven months to review and comment on the critical habitat proposal and the draft economic analysis.

"As a result of the extensive public comment we received on our proposed designation, the Service found there were many areas that already had conservation efforts in place and did not need to be designated," said Dave Allen, regional director of the Service’s Pacific Region. "In other areas, the Service found that the social and economic cost of a designation outweighed the conservation benefit."

 

Court Decision Pushed Feds to Complete Bull Trout Habitat Rule (Cont’d)

The Klamath Water Users Association in May 2003 submitted formal comments on the proposed rule, and focused concerns on the proposal to include Agency Lake as critical habitat for bull trout.

In response to several requests, and in accordance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the USFWS also is conducting a five-year review on the bull trout to determine whether a change in status is warranted. That review is expected to be finished in 2005. Meanwhile, work on a recovery plan for bull trout is on hold until the review to determine whether the species is threatened is complete.

Under the ESA, federal agencies must ensure that any activity they fund, carry out or authorize is not likely to destroy or adversely modify a protected species’ critical habitat. By consulting with the USFWS, an agency can minimize or avoid any potential conflicts with listed species and their critical habitat, and the proposed project may proceed.

In 30 years of implementing the ESA, USFWS has found that the designation of critical habitat provides little additional protection to most listed species, while preventing the agency from using scarce conservation resources for activities with greater conservation benefits.

The USFWS will publish the final designation for bull trout in the Federal Register in the near future.

Maps, fact sheets, photographs and other materials relating to this week’s announcement may be found on the Pacific Region’s Bull Trout Website at http://species.fws.gov/bulltrout.

Continued on page 3


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

Relationship of Bull Trout Critical Habitat Rule to the Klamath Project

This week’s designation of bull trout critical habitat on Agency Lake has an unknown, but very definite potential, impact on the ability of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to meet fishery, refuge and irrigation demands associated with Klamath Project operations. While federal officials downplay the potential impacts of critical habitat on private property owners, they do not dispute that federal activities can be influenced by such a designation. Critical habitat refers to specific geographic areas that are essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and which may require special management considerations. A designation does not set up a preserve or refuge, but it can apply to situations where Federal funding, permits, or projects are involved.

Operation of the Klamath Project by Reclamation involves storage of water in Upper Klamath Lake, including Agency Lake and Agency Lake Ranch. Water is diverted during irrigation season into the A-canal at the southern end of Upper Klamath Lake to supply Klamath Project irrigation and refuge water needs. Water is also released into the Klamath River downstream of Link River Dam to meet the needs of agriculture, national wildlife refuges, coho salmon, and other purposes.

The Upper Klamath Lake critical habitat subunit of the Klamath River Distinct Population Segment of bull trout appears to have the potential to directly impact Klamath Project operations. The areas included within this subunit are considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to be essential to restoring migratory forms of bull trout

in the Upper Klamath Lake core area and reestablishing connectivity among populations of bull trout in Rock, Cherry, Threemile, and

Relationship of Bull Trout Critical Habitat to the Klamath Project (Cont’d)

Sevenmile Creeks on the west side of the upper Klamath Basin, and populations of bull trout in the Wood River drainage and Crater Lake National Park.

The USFWS proposes to provide a migratory corridor for bull trout in Agency Lake. In comments submitted to USFWS on May 12, 2003, the Klamath Water Users Association (KWUA) expressed skepticism over this original proposal.

"We have questions about the historic presence of migratory bull trout in this area, and are further concerned about the hospitability of this environment for newly introduced bull trout in the future," the KWUA letter stated. "We believe the benefits of excluding this area from critical habitat designation outweigh the benefits, and do not believe that failure to designate this area as critical habitat will result in the extinction of the species."

KWUA noted in its comment letter that the proposed habitat designation and recovery plan could prove to be a significant factor as federally-funded future storage enhancement and water purchase programs are considered north of Upper Klamath Lake. KWUA at the time supported the general intent expressed by others – including Water for Life, Inc. – to revise the proposed rule and create a critical habitat designation that is narrowly tailored to minimize economic impacts to existing rural water users and their communities.

KWUA’s specific concerns with the final critical habitat designation are further outlined elsewhere in this newsletter.


 

Continued on page 4


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

KWUA Believes USFWS Needs to Justify Inclusion of Agency Lake in New Rule

Klamath Project irrigators formally expressed concerns about critical habitat rules proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 2003 for the Klamath Basin. Specifically, the Klamath Water Users Association (KWUA) asked USFWS to provide further justification for its proposal to "re-establish" a "migratory corridor" between distinct populations of bullhead trout located on tributaries to Upper Klamath Lake.

KWUA’s first concern is that the proposed rule does not clearly demonstrate that migratory populations of trout historically utilized this area. Secondly, this area currently fails to satisfy several of the "constituent elements" to qualify for designation as bull trout critical habitat.

Did Migratory Populations of Bull Trout Utilize the Agency Lake Area?

Based on the information presented in the Draft Recovery Plan, KWUA could not discern any empirical data that document the presence of bull trout either currently or historically in Agency Lake. Consider the following:

  • USFWS cites a previous study that found "historical records for the Klamath Basin suggest that bull trout in this distinct population segment were once widely distributed and exhibited diverse life-history traits in that part of their range" (Ziller 1992). However, Ziller’s study focused on the Sprague River subbasin. USFWS did not provide evidence suggesting that the Ziller study specifically addressed the presence of migratory bull trout in the area of northern Upper Klamath Lake and Agency Lake.

USFWS Needs to Justify Inclusion of Agency Lake in Bull Trout Rule (Cont’d)

  • USFWS finds that, currently, "bull trout in this basin are almost entirely nonmigratory, resident fish that are confined to headwater streams." (Goetz 1989 as cited in USFWS 2002).

  • The proposed rule acknowledges "…uncertainty about the exact historical range, the number and size of historical populations, and the role of natural factors in the status of the species."

  • "Thermal limits to bull trout distribution may be a factor in several locations in the Klamath River basin. Lower-elevation streams may not have been hospitable for bull trout, even historically."

  • "….reestablishment of migratory fish and potential refounding of extinct bull trout populations may be a slow process, if it occurs at all."

The Draft Recovery Plan stated that it is "essential to establish with greater certainty the current distribution and season use areas of remnant migratory bull trout within the mainstem rivers within the Klamath River Recovery Unit." KWUA’s May 2003 letter agreed.

"In the absence of other information that indicates otherwise, we believe this observation can be made with greater conviction when applied specifically to the northern fringes of Upper Klamath Lake and Agency Lake," the letter stated.

_________________________

50 CFR Part 17, RIN 1018-AI52, Page 17
Id. Page 19
Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan, Chapter 2, p. 28.
Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan, Chapter 1, p. 25.

Continued on page 5


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

USFWS Needs to Justify Inclusion of Agency Lake in Bull Trout Rule (Cont’d)

Agency Lake Does Not Appear to Qualify as Bull Trout Critical Habitat

Included as critical habitat are some areas with low levels of bull trout occupancy or where presence of the species is unknown. Upper Klamath Lake and Agency Lake appear to fall into this category. In accordance with section 3(5)(A)(i) of the ESA and regulations at 50 CFR 424.12, in determining which areas to propose as critical habitat, USFWS is required to base its proposal on the best scientific data available, and to consider those physical and biological features that are essential to the conservation of the species and that may require special management considerations or protection. The regulations also require that USFWS include a list of known primary constituent elements with the critical habitat determination.

USFWS determined nine primary constituent elements for bull trout from studies of their habitat requirements, life-history characteristics, and population biology. It appears that inclusion of Agency Lake as proposed critical habitat fails to satisfy at least two of these elements:

1. The Agency Lake "migratory corridor" does not possess "minimal physical, biological or chemical barriers….including intermittent or seasonal barriers induced by high water temperatures":

  • "Thermal limits to bull trout distribution may be a factor in several locations in the Klamath River basin. Lower-elevation streams may not historically have been hospitable for bull trout, even historically."

Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan, Chapter 2, p. 28.

 

USFWS Needs to Justify Inclusion of Agency Lake in Bull Trout Rule (Cont’d)

  • According to USFWS, "one species of myxosporean parasite has been found in Klamath River drainages and lower elevation tributaries to Klamath Lake. The distribution of this parasite within the Klamath River basin is unknown….whether Klamath River bull trout are resistant is unknown. If bull trout are susceptible to this parasite, recovery of the char beyond colder natal and mainstem drainages could be difficult."

  • Poor water quality conditions are related to extremely large blooms of blue green algae. These water quality conditions in Agency Lake limit its value as habitat for bull trout during summer months.

2. UKL / Agency Lake conditions do not satisfy USFWS criteria that "few, or no predatory, interbreeding, or competitive nonnative species" are present.

According to the Draft Recovery Plan (DRP), competition between bull trout and nonnative species has undoubtedly been a contributing factor in the decline of bull trout in the Klamath River basin. Hybridization with nonnative species is a very significant threat and has been a major contributor to the decline of bull trout in the Klamath River Recovery Unit. Chapter 1 of the DRP notes that restoring connectivity of the type proposed along northern UKL and Agency Lake must not encourage invasion of nonnative species. The proposed rule does not evaluate the potential for increased predation by warmwater nonnative fish (e.g. perch) on newly introduced, "migratory" bull trout.
_________________________

Draft Recovery Plan, Chapter 1, Page 43.

Continued on page 6


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

Bull Trout Habitat Designation for Agency Lake Raises Economic Concerns

Significant economic impacts could result if Klamath Project water supply potential is limited due to uncertain future critical habit-driven conditions placed on Agency Lake Ranch and surrounding properties, claim Klamath Project irrigators.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) in 1998 purchased Agency Lake Ranch to increase the water storage capacity of Agency and Upper Klamath Lakes and make that additional storage available for Klamath Project purposes. Since that time, water has been diverted onto the property during late winter and spring months when inflows to Upper Klamath Lake exceed the storage capacity of the lake. Water is then pumped off in late May and June, directly into Agency Lake. Reclamation plans to continue using Agency Lake Ranch for water storage during winter and spring months. This property is located within the proposed Upper Klamath Lake Critical Habitat Subunit.

Plans have also been proposed to further enhance Upper Klamath Lake supplies by conjunctively managing Agency Lake Ranch with the adjacent Barnes property, which could be transferred to federal ownership in the near future. Proponents of this project say that proper design and operation of these properties will help alleviate the burden borne by Klamath Project irrigators to meet ESA requirements for suckers and coho salmon.

ESA requires that USFWS take into consideration the economic impact, and any other relevant impact, of specifying a particular area as critical habitat. Areas may be excluded from critical habitat designation if it can be demonstrated that the

 

Habitat Designation for Agency Lake Raises Economic Concerns (Cont’d)

benefits of such exclusion outweigh the benefits of including the areas within critical habitat, unless it is determined that the failure to designate such area as critical habitat will result in the extinction of the species. In order to be included in a critical habitat designation, the habitat must be "essential to the conservation of the species."

"It does not appear from our studies that exclusion of Agency Lake from the critical habitat rule will result in the extinction of the bull trout," said Dan Keppen, Executive Director of the Klamath Water Users Association.

Significant economic impacts could result if Klamath Project water supply potential is limited due to uncertain future critical habit-driven conditions placed on Agency Lake Ranch and surrounding properties imposed by a critical habitat designation.

"Even with the uncertain nature associated with how such a critical habitat designation would affect management of these properties, past experience with other types of regulatory processes validates our concerns," said Keppen.

The Draft Recovery Plan even provides a hint of how a critical habitat designation that overlaps Agency Lake Ranch could impact future operations when it addresses future implications in its discussion on dams and water control structures on Klamath bull trout.

"The degree of threat posed by these structures will undoubtedly change as abundance and distribution of local and migratory populations of bull trout increase in response to recovery actions," it notes.

Continued on page 7


 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

No Secret Meetings Going at USBR –
Just a Parking Lot Improvement

The mass of cars and trucks parked outside the offices of the Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service complex on Washburn Way in Klamath Falls does not indicate the presence of high-level, secret negotiations. Instead, a recent paving job within the fenced enclosure surrounding the offices has forced federal employees to park along Washburn Way. The local Bureau folks have asked that we extend their message to be patient with the construction project.
 


CALENDAR OF EVENTS

Monday, September 27, 2004. Wetlands Tour. Hosted by the Klamath Watershed Council, The Urban Issues Group and the Klamath River Group. 10:00 a.m. Parking area south of 203 Riverside Drive, Klamath Falls, Oregon

 

 

Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX   (541) 883-8893  

kwua@cvcwireless.net 

Weekly Update
Sept 24, 2004
www.kwua.org

 

Content and Logo: Copyright © Klamath Water Users Association, 2002 All Rights Reserved