|
Report models Basin water flows
Herald and News by Dylan Darling December 20, 2005
________________________________
Home
http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2005/12/20/news/top_stories/top1.txt
Take away the Klamath
Reclamation Project. Take away irrigation in the Sprague River Valley. Take
away all agricultural water draws in the Klamath Basin.
How much water flowed in and out of the Basin before humans started
channeling, diverting and storing it?
That's what a recently
released report by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation aims to answer. But the
report, long sought by differing sides in the ongoing debate over Klamath
water, doesn't go into specifics on how the flow was different.
“It would be more or less, depending on the water year,” said Cecil Lesley,
land and operations chief for the Bureau's Klamath Falls office.
He said the report offers a model that scientists can put numbers into to
determine what unimpaired flows in the Basin looked like.
“It's a tool. It's tool for everybody to use that we didn't have before,”
Lesley said.
But it's not a tool one can just pick up. It takes training to use.
John Hicks, Bureau water conservation specialist, called the report a
“highly technical tool.”
He said the model is complex because
determining what natural flows were takes more than just subtracting what
the Project draws.
Along with the Project
and other irrigation, the report examines the impacts of fire suppression,
juniper encroachment, beaver trapping and logging on water flows.
Now that that tool is forged, Hicks said federal scientists might use it in
January to determine what natural flows were like.
Entitled “Natural Flow of the Upper Klamath River,” the 115-page report,
with 160 pages of appendices, dissects what has changed flows through the
Basin.
“The last vestige of
predevelopment watershed conditions unaffected by agricultural development
was probably gone by about 1960,” the report says.
Work on the report started in mid-2002, a few months after Dave Sabo became
manager of the Klamath Project. Sabo asked federal scientists to determine
what flows were like before agriculture in the Basin.
The first draft of the
report, released in December 2003, showed water in the Basin used to get
lower than it does now. A reorganized report was released in December 2004,
and a workgroup then met three times over the past year, reviewing the
report.
The workgroup included representatives from American Indian tribes on the
lower and upper parts of the Klamath Basin, the state of Oregon and the
Klamath Water Users Association.
Irrigators hope the
report can be used by the federal government to help determine requirements
of protected species in the Basin, said Greg Addington, water users
executive director.
The group, which represents 1,400 water users, will have the report vetted
by engineers to determine its potential impact on water supplies in the
Basin.
 |
|
| |
“We have just got to
decipher that thing and figure out what is going on,” Addington said.
Water in the upper Basin comes from 4,250 square miles, or 2.7 million
acres, above Keno.
The report shows that 1.3 million acre-feet of water would flow down the
Klamath River at Keno annually before changes brought by humans. Hicks said
the flow since the changes is about 1.13 million acre-feet, but that number
has decreased by the past five dry years.
He said the model needs to be used to make an accurate comparison.
The report will now be reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The
review is expected to be done by June 2007.
On the Net:
www.usbr.gov/mp/kbao
Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541) 883-6100
FAX (541) 883-8893
kwua@cvcwireless.net |