Klamath's water
woes run deep
followed by commentary of Barbara Hall, Klamath Bucket
Brigade
With a shrinking water
table, it's clear the government must reduce demand for water in the
Klamath Basin
Sunday, May 09, 2004
Now the thirst for water in
the Klamath Basin is drying up wells and shrinking the water table. The
day is here when the Bush administration must concede that there is too
much demand for too little water in the Klamath.
It is not enough to keep
raining federal tax money on the basin in hopes of avoiding hard decisions
about a supply of water that is simply too small to adequately meet the
demands of farmers, fish and wildlife. Millions of tax dollars that paid
for emergency wells and a federal water bank have not resolved the
underlying water crisis in the basin.
Instead, the government's
decision to pay farmers to irrigate crops with billions of gallons of
water from wells is quickly drying up the Klamath's groundwater. The water
table has plunged as much as 20 feet in just three years, according to a
report last Sunday by The Oregonian's Michael Milstein.
It has also left the Klamath
as a rare place in this country where American taxpayers not only are
subsidizing the crops that farmers are growing, but also paying for their
irrigation.
None of this is sustainable.
You can't forever chase a dwindling supply of groundwater by drilling ever
deeper. You can't keep going to the well of government subsidies, either.
Yet the Oregon Water
Resources Department keeps right on issuing groundwater permits, some for
wells that could yield millions of gallons of water a day, even though the
dangers of that policy seem obvious. And the Bush administration has shown
no sign of conceding that it's time to begin reducing demand for water in
the Klamath, even by allowing willing sellers to retire their farms and
irrigation permits.
By now there is overwhelming
evidence that there's not enough water to go around. In 2001, Klamath
Project farmers suffered when water supplies were abruptly cut off to
protect endangered fish in Klamath Lake and Klamath River. The next year
farmers got full irrigation deliveries, but tens of thousands of salmon
died in the too-low, too-warm Klamath River.
Every year the wildlife
refuges of the Klamath Basin, some of the most important lands in the
Pacific Flyway, are left without adequate water. Last summer the refuges
went six straight weeks without any water deliveries.
There's a scramble now to
consider other hugely expensive solutions to the water shortage in the
Klamath. One irrigation district wants to drill large wells in north
Klamath County and pour the water into Upper Klamath Lake for use by
farmers. Another is pitching the idea for a new 19,000-acre reservoir on a
former lake bed south of Klamath Falls.
Those ideas may hold some
promise. So might many other efforts now under way in the basin, including
projects to increase habitat for endangered suckers and potentially allow
farmers to take more water out of Klamath Lake.
Yet it seems clear that the
only real long-term solution is to bring water demand in line with the
actual, sustainable supply in the basin. The water table is dropping as
much as 5 feet a year. There's no future in that.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
The following response is by Barbara Hall, Klamath Bucket Brigade
The editorial board of
the Oregonian should really check their facts before once again repeating
old tired lies. But as we all know, every time a lie is repeated and
spun, it gains strength as the truth. How many times do we have to put up
with this before they start doing their homework and start reporting the
truth?
The only crop that is
subsidized in the Klamath Project is wheat! Onions, potatoes, mint,
horseradish, alfalfa, and grass hay are not subsidized! How many times do
we have to repeat that?
And the government is not
paying for our irrigation; only paying farmers to pump water from
their drought wells to satisfy the NOAA/NMFS tribal trust ordered water
bank.
And the only reason we
now have a "water shortage" in the Klamath Project is because of
governmental laws such as the ESA and those tribal trust obligations. And
one section of the ESA says that reservoir water can't be used for
endangered or threatened species. What do you think Upper Klamath Lake
is? It's a reservoir built and paid for by the farmers in the Klamath
Project.
Before 2001, there was
plenty of water to go around - farmers, fish (both suckers and salmon),
and refuges got water even in bad drought years. The Klamath Project
takes only 4 to 5% of the total water available in the entire upper and
lower Klamath Basins. I'm sick and tired of our farmers and ranchers
being made the scapegoat for everything that happens in the entire 1.4
MILLION acres of the entire Klamath River Basin when the Klamath Project
is only 220,000 acres. Our measly 400,000 acre-feet of water is chicken
feed compared to the average of 12 Million acre-feet of Klamath River
water that flows out into the Pacific.
Klamath Water Users Association
2455 Patterson Street, Suite 3
Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603
Phone (541)-883-6100
FAX (541)-883-8893 kwua@cvcwireless.net